Posted by: Alec Mouhibian | September 24, 2009

The BS Degree

I have piece in American Spectator on bullshit majors.

Posted by: Alec Mouhibian | September 16, 2009

Hey, Drama Critics

Go ahead and rave an ambitious play like August: Osage County, if you must. But at least warn us if it contains the following line, which some discerning customers might consider a dead giveaway of its actual quality:

I’m white and over 30 — I don’t get in trouble!

“This is absolutely a political parable,” says August’s playwright Tracy Letts, in the program notes to the Los Angeles production of his big hit. Well, political parables are known to corrupt art, and absolute political parables…corrupt even more than non-absolute ones.

Posted by: Alec Mouhibian | August 30, 2009

In the beginning was yadda yadda

What is set down in orderly and seemly sentences, even today, always has some flavor in it of the stilted rubbish that the Sumerian kings used to engrave upon their tombs. The current cliches get into it inevitably; it is never quite honest. Complete honesty, intellectually, seldom expresses itself in formal words: its agents of notification are rather winks and sniggers, hip flasks and dead cats.

– H.L. Mencken, against blogging

Posted by: Alec Mouhibian | July 3, 2009

From Philip Larkin’s review of a Mahalia Jackson biography

After a specially successful performance, with everyone crying, an admirer asked “How do you do it?” Mahalia fixed the full force of her being on him.

“Don’t you KNOW,” she said in disgust.

Posted by: Alec Mouhibian | June 23, 2009

Message in a Bottle

In an essay on the various qualities of wetting the whistle, philosopher Roger Scruton delineates the Puritan roots of binge-drinking. I made the same point (in my own stilted and clumsy way) three years ago in the Daily Bruin.

This gives me all the confidence I need to continue my campaigns against traveling, dessert, and waking up.

Posted by: Alec Mouhibian | May 6, 2009

A View From Above

God 1: They look like ants from up here.

God 2: What do the ants look like?

[Laughter]

Posted by: hovannisian | December 21, 2008

Measlier Shaven

Peter the Great thought beards were anti-European. He outlawed them. Ayn Rand thought beards were masks for psychological problems. She condemned them. But the beard of my uncle poured love into the soul of every beard-hater. There was mystery in the beard, but honesty, too. It made him a man of ideas, but also a man of the earth. (“Terrorist,” said some among us, but that was the lazy man’s way of saying the same thing.) The beard revealed contradiction in him, but also timelessness and universality, and I always believed that if there was any one man who could seduce angels, it was him.

Then he shaved his beard. Samson spun in his grave. Armies of angels withdrew from the earth. And when my uncle walked into a house party last night, women huddled over margaritas turned pale and whispered their new agonies to each other. The men were relieved of envy, but even envious men were hurt to know that a remarkable thing of beauty had been erased. Just what stale thought had convinced him to slice the poetry from his face and send it down a two-inch hole in some sink in Northridge, Calif.?

Some blamed the wife. Others blamed the man himself. A preacher forecast the end times. There were at least two judges in the room, and at least a dozen lawyers, but there was nothing anybody could do to bring the beard back.

Only time can do that. And until it does, I will refuse to talk to my uncle, or to call him by his name. I have rearranged its letters, and I have found that they settle into a suitable anagram: “Measlier Shaven.”

Posted by: Alec Mouhibian | November 18, 2008

Indoor Fence

The rough is greener than the fairway
Which is greener than the green
Which is easily the greenest thing
That I have ever seen.
There is no fence around that grass
It has no ceiling made of glass
No fence nowhere on this course, unless

You count the condominium
Whose window looks so lonely with no hole.

Posted by: hovannisian | October 18, 2008

Death in Paris

In death, we are all equals.

But I lost this consolation, too—lost it on the grounds of Cemitaire du Pere Lachaise on a spooky, wind-swept Paris afternoon.

H.L. Mencken once defined a cynic as “a man who, when he smells flowers, looks around for a funeral.” But I swear there was something infinitely more cynical in the movements of this wandering tourist who, in desperate search for a funeral, began to look around for flowers.

My cemetery map had proven to be useless, you understand, and so I quickly realized that I had no other recourse but to find my favorite graves by their flowers. That is how I found Chopin and Moliere. That is how I all-too-quickly found Jim Morrison of The Doors, who lay under a pile of grandiose red roses.

Balzac, Proust, and Wilde were much less decorated—and more elusive.

Oh, but Wilde—the poorest of them all! Only a few defeated tulips lay by his gravestone. The inscription had all but faded, along with its meaning. I read out loud: “And alien tears will fill for him / Pity’s long broken urn / For his mourners will be outcast men / And outcasts always mourn.” These outcasts, they should mourn with flowers, I thought.

Hours I spent in the cemetery, and afternoon swelled into evening, but I felt so unfulfilled by my visit, so disappointed and humiliated by the flowers game.

I attempted to dissolve my humiliation in a cup of coffee at the historic Hotel des Beaux Arts. I sat on a sofa next to a bookshelf, and admired the old volumes of literature that were assembled there. Then I noticed the two framed photographs. The first was of a middle-aged Oscar Wilde; he had died at this hotel in 1900. The second was of a young Argentine boy who would grow to be Jorge Luis Borges, the great man of myths and letters whose imagination these very alcoves had once unleashed.

Two women sitting nearby noticed my interest in the photographs.

“Are you a writer?” the brunette asked in English.

I looked at her for the first time and noticed she was young and beautiful.

“Yes,” I said.

“How nice,” said the blonde, equally beautiful. “We are here with a writer, too.”

“Who?” I asked.

“He’s very famous here,” the blonde said.

“What does he write?” I asked, wondering if they were going to sleep with him.

“Trash,” the brunette said, laughing mischievously.

“Cocaine and parties,” the blonde clarified—meaning, probably, yes.

And in walked the tall, bearded man of maybe forty, sat down, yelled out for drinks, and turned his attention onto me.

“Thank you for entertaining the girls,” he said sincerely. “Ahh, women. Beautiful and painful. Don’t you agree?”

“I agree,” I said, “but you must find more beauty than pain.”

“Now they are beautiful; later they will be painful,” he said, and I told him those were wonderful words and that I would like to use them.

We spoke of Camus and swimming pools and all sorts of things (except cabbages and kings) and, at the end of it, we scribbled our identities in notepads, and promised to read each other.

I was in a softer mood now and, outside, so were the winds. I walked down toward St. Germain, past the cozy cafés where Sartre once sat, and past the brasserie where once Hemingway had a serving of some very inspirational potato salad. I was happier with Paris now.

And I expressed my happiness that night to my Parisian friend. I sat at his kitchen table and told him about my day and the flowers and the kind, quick-witted man I met at the Hotel des Beaux Arts.

“What was his name?” my friend asked.

I pulled out my notepad, flipped it to the seventy-third page, and handed it over.

My friend drew a grand smile.

He shouted: “You met F—!”

“I did.” I said. “But who is he?”

“He’s very, very famous,” my friend said. “He’s a novelist. He’s been in movies.” My friend drew another smile. This time there was a trace of envy. I smiled, too, marveling in my unexpected literary moment, until my friend continued to speak.

“But I hate him,” my friend announced.

“Why?” I asked, almost defensively.

And here my friend fell back into form and went on and on, pretending he had never smiled, saying how that man F— was a shallow, womanizing fraud, a pretender, a bourgeois-boheme, and how that line about women and beauty and pain, it wasn’t even his—F— had stolen it!

“From whom?” I asked sorrowfully.

“Baudelaire, of course!” my friend said, smiling again.

“Right,” I said, and I began to wonder how many flowers Baudelaire had on his grave.

Posted by: Alec Mouhibian | September 24, 2008

How Bout That Band!

After crooning a song in public, I like to thank my imaginary band. It includes Jimmy H. Ivies on the tuba, “all the way from San Francisco,” and Billy Bo Bob Jackson Bobby on the ukulele. “And for those of you out there who said I’d never make it with just a tuba-ukulele duo,” I add triumphantly, “nnnnuh” [obscene Italian gesture].

Last week on a plane ride I was sitting next to a talkative Army trainee who just graduated high school. He said his dream house is a Boeing 767. We shared a passion for hearses—his favorite being the 1959 Cadillac—and he came around to mentioning that he plays a musical instrument.

“Oh,” I said. “Which one?”

“The tuba.”

“Well, that’s funny,” I responded, ready to launch into an explanation of my whole imaginary band shtick, when all of a sudden he pulled out an oddly-shaped black case from the lower compartment and began to unzip it.

“I also play the ukulele.”

Wittgenstein put it best: On US Airways, we are condemned to die in company and rejoice alone. (Tee-hee. I’m German and you’re not.)

Posted by: Alec Mouhibian | August 24, 2008

“Rooster story? Put that in human interest”

– His Girl Friday

Posted by: Alec Mouhibian | August 21, 2008

College Paper Cover Story

My Washington City Paper cover story about college rags is now out. Reviewed in the piece are the official papers of Georgetown, George Washington, Catholic U, Howard, Maryland, and American. Read it here or, if you happen to be interning in D.C., pick up a copy at your nearest bathhouse.

Posted by: Alec Mouhibian | July 28, 2008

Cynicism and Compassion

In the misfortunes of our best friends we always find something not altogether displeasing to us. — LaRochefoucauld

Smart cynicism usually requires patience. At its bottom you might find a pessimistic hope that’s far better than the “optimistic despair”—as Andrew Ferguson deliciously described the message of Barack Obama—available at so many bargain bins.

Take the maxim quoted above. Possibly the most devastatingly cynical line ever written, it’ll disturb the hell out of you until you realize that compassion depends on it being true. As Wordsworth observed: “We have no sympathy but what is propagated by pleasure…wherever we sympathize with pain it will be found that the sympathy is produced and carried on by subtle combinations with pleasure.”

Three “not altogether displeasing” things about a best friend’s misfortune immediately come to mind. The misfortune can confirm your view of a friend’s shortcomings. It can pale the grass on the other side of the fence, thus correcting an imagined inferiority. It can give you an opportunity to feel useful. In the case of an evangelical excited by the crisis of an unbelieving friend it can do all three at once.

Obviously the maxim doesn’t apply to every misfortune. Death never incites such disturbing pleasure. It also paralyzes the sympathetic faculties, even though it’s perhaps the only universal experience in the world. Barring a special kind of genius that could make a threesome out of death—a genius whose existence I wouldn’t rule out—we all die alone. On the other hand, we’re most commonly and explicitly assisted by our friends in recovering from a romance that they’re most likely delighted to see broken.

Not that the maxim applies to all friends, either. But consider what happens when it doesn’t. Someone too sensitive to find anything pleasing in a friend’s misfortune will probably be offended by his newfound superiority, and back off. Resignation will soon turn to resentment, which in the absence of strong character can easily become contempt. A friend’s misfortune in this case highlights one’s own fortune and undermines the illusion of deserved achievement.

The upshot is clear enough. Without some kind of pleasure to activate compassion friends are helpless in a time of need.

Posted by: Alec Mouhibian | July 23, 2008

Summer Reading Rec: Andrew Ferguson

Garin and I both contributed to Liberty Magazine’s summer books feature. My entry’s below.

Most of my summer reading is reserved for the classics I was too stupid to enjoy in high school. But here I’d like to alert you to the most underrated great American writer alive, in hopes that one day you will thank me with a burnt offering. His name is Andrew Ferguson and he writes for The Weekly Standard—where his byline is always worth seeking for the wiggle-quality pleasures sure to be found below it. Barack Obama, Fred Thompson, Alan Greenspan, and Bill Moyers are just a few of the notable subjects to have received his nonpareil literary treatment.

And now Ferguson, who looks like the love-child of Mark Twain and Samuel Clemens, has given us the 21st century Life on the Mississippi in his first full-length book: Land of Lincoln: Adventures in Abe’s America. Only substitute for the river a parade of myriad Lincoln nuts, of whom Ferguson counts himself one.

As its title suggests, this book is more about America than it is about Lincoln (who can best be described by the phrase, “scholars differ.”) Ferguson ventures insightfully and hilariously into the many-splendored manifestations of Lincoln’s influence: lovers, haters, collectors, curators, “realists,” impersonators, worshippers, and more. Finally he makes his own poignant case in favor of Lincoln the icon.

Ferguson’s a first-rate wit and phrase-maker, but his most remarkable skill lies in narrative construction. His satirical work is done cleanly and quietly, leaving no traces, and he can sever a pound of flesh without drawing a drop of blood. (If he were around in the fictional Venice of 1500, Shylock might’ve died a Jew.) It’s a kind of humanizing satire which, rather than merely cutting its targets down to size, renders them more complex and interesting than they began. And the subtlety of it all lends the punch-lines more of that wiggle effect.

A review ought to quote examples from the book. But this isn’t a review. It’s an order. Follow it, and you’ll have no trouble keeping in mind that I like mine medium-rare on the rare side.

Posted by: hovannisian | July 19, 2008

Spider corpse

You’ll forgive me, I think, for leaving the blog to the better blogger. I’ve been spending my days in the cellar of my Los Angeles home, sifting through articles and love letters and yearbook inscriptions — spending time with passions and possibilities that have long expired. I don’t know what I’m looking for in my family’s past. Maybe proof that we are all ultimately different; maybe that we are the same. I don’t know which I prefer. The spiders — the frightening, gray spiders — are everywhere, and they are all crunchy and dead. Abandon hope, all ye who enter here.

After a few hours in the cellar, I’m covered in sweat. The dust has clogged up my mouth and nose, has become a part of me. And I get the feeling that history is in me, killing me, defiling me, condemning me to a past version of myself that isn’t me.

Older Posts »

Categories